Washington - The F.B.I. has failed to aggressively investigate accusations of espionage against a translator at the bureau and fired the translator’s co-worker in large part for bringing the accusations, the Justice Department’s inspector general concluded …

For Full Story See…
http://www.truthout.org/docs_05/011605X.shtml
Or
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/15/national/15translate.html

Washington - The F.B.I. has failed to aggressively investigate accusations of espionage against a translator at the bureau and fired the translator’s co-worker in large part for bringing the accusations, the Justice Department’s inspector general concluded on Friday.

In a long-awaited report that the Justice Department sought for months to keep classified, the inspector general issued a sharp rebuke to the F.B.I. over its handling of claims of espionage and ineptitude made by Sibel Edmonds, a bureau translator who was fired in 2002 after superiors deemed her conduct “disruptive.”

Ms. Edmonds, who translated material in Turkish, Persian and Azerbaijani, had complained about slipshod translations and management problems in the bureau’s translation section and raised accusations of possible espionage against a fellow linguist.

The report from the office of Glenn A. Fine, the Justice Department’s inspector general, reached no conclusions about whether Ms. Edmonds’s co-worker had actually engaged in espionage, and it did not give details about the espionage accusations because they remain classified. But officials have said Ms. Edmonds said the co-worker, a fellow Turkish linguist, had blocked the translation of material involving foreign acquaintances of hers who had come under suspicion.

In general, Mr. Fine’s investigation found that many of Ms. Edmonds’s accusations “were supported, that the F.B.I. did not take them seriously enough and that her allegations were, in fact, the most significant factor in the F.B.I.’s decision to terminate her services.”

For Full Story See…
http://www.truthout.org/docs_05/011605X.shtml
Or
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/15/national/15translate.html

STANDARD DISCLAIMER FROM UQ.ORG: UnansweredQuestions.org does not necessarily endorse the views expressed in the above article. We present this in the interests of research -for the relevant information we believe it contains. We hope that the reader finds in it inspiration to work with us further, in helping to build bridges between our various investigative communities, towards a greater, common understanding of the unanswered questions which now lie before us.

Popularity: 15% [?]